Via Paul Krugman at the New York Times, a visual that shows real income history for the 35-44 crowd:
But you’ll be glad to know that those over 65 have seen a huge jump in their income under the current administration, in contrast. For many, the housing rush was one of the only ways the younger crowd (read: still working) could better their financial fortunes during the past 5 or so years, even if they were busy leveraging themselves to untenable levels to make it happen. With housing now a complete bust, and the correction cycle in its infant stages, the ugly truth on real income is much more hard to ignore. I’ve said that housing and mortgages will be central to the upcoming election, and this is why.
Most Popular Articles
While many homebuilders, such as D.R. Horton and Tri Pointe Homes, significantly reduced the number of new home starts over the last quarter amid sluggish homebuyer demand, Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is taking a different approach, akin to that of Lennar. Pace over price. The builder’s strategy reflects a commitment to affordability and serving the […]
-
Mortgage rate declines are raising the likelihood of a refi surge
Mar 19, 2026 -
Homebuilders Urged To Invest In Frontline Jobsite Workers Now
Mar 19, 2026 -
How hybrid operations are elevating builder performance
Apr 30, 2026 9:50 am -
HousingWire Mortgage Rankings have arrived, bringing data-driven benchmark to originator performance
Apr 30, 2026 -
After An Involuntary Pause, Orders Matter Again For LGI
Mar 20, 2026
Latest Articles
HousingWire on Tuesday announced the launch of the HousingWire Mortgage Rankings, a new performance intelligence product designed to provide a clear, data-driven view of mortgage origination activity across the U.S. The rankings benchmark mortgage originators based on observed production, offering a standardized view of performance across geographies, loan types and channels. Historically, the mortgage industry has lacked […]