Newly-installed Dept. of Housing and Urban Development secretary Steve Preston said in remarks Tuesday that a housing bill moving through the Senate could help contribute to the insolvency of the Federal Housing Administration if not amended before ostensibly heading to President Bush for signing. The Senate version of a housing package currently under consideration (HR 3221) contains provisions that would place a moratorium on so-called risk-based pricing for FHA mortgage loans, while still passing an overhaul of the FHA direct lending program that would see the government agency insure an additional $300 billion in mostly subprime mortgages refinanced from troubled borrowers. The House version of the package does not address risk-based pricing. Risk-based pricing allows a lender to price its insurance premiums for borrowers according to their credit risk, a move that HUD is looking to implement on July 14 with a planned expansion of the FHASecure borrower assistance program rolled out by President Bush in August of last year. This will eliminate a pricing inequity that treats applicants with a low risk of default the same as those with a high risk of default. The Senate package would bar that from taking place, a move that Preston said “would be a big mistake.” “FHA will have to increase premiums across the board on all borrowers or, alternatively, seek taxpayer funds in October to cover potential losses, or cut back on the program at the very time we are an island of hope for hundreds of thousands of Americans,” he said in remarks delivered to an FDIC forum on affordable and low-income lending. His remarks echo earlier warnings about the agency’s solvency by FHA commissioner Brian Montgomery, who said in early June that seller-funded down payment programs also threatened the solvency of the Depression-era program. “We remain solvent and in good shape today,” Preston said. “But no insurance company can continue to absorb losses of this magnitude.” Preston said that risk-based pricing was critical to FHA’s ability to serve lower-income borrowers, noting that families with lower incomes often have higher FICO scores; forcing them to pay a higher insurance premium was hurting their homeownership chances, he argued. “These are hard-working American families who live within their means and pay their bills on time,” he said. “Pricing mechanisms should reflect that fact.” Whether the housing bill under consideration makes it out of the Senate, and can be presented to President Bush before this year out, remains uncertain. See an earlier HW report on the bill’s progress through the Senate.
HUD Chief Concerned with Housing Package, Pushes for Risk-Based Pricing
July 9, 2008, 11:37am by Paul Jackson
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Test
The story for the housing market over the past three years has been, “Home sales are down, home prices are up.” Because inventory was so restricted after the pandemic, prices pushed higher even as demand weakened. That story may finally be inverting as unsold inventory of homes is now great enough that home prices are […]
-
Freddie Mac’s Donna Spencer on their Servicing Excellence initiative
-
Lower mortgage rates attracting more homebuyers
-
Rocket Pro TPO raises conforming loan limit to $802,650 ahead of FHFA’s decision
-
Show up, don’t show off: Laura O’Connor is redefining success in real estate
-
Between the lines: Understanding the nuances of the NAR settlement
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on SMS (Opens in new window) SMS
- Click to copy link (Opens in new window) Link Copy
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio