Inventory
info icon
Single family homes on the market. Updated weekly.Powered by Altos Research
624,419-11,013
30-yr Fixed Rate30-yr Fixed
info icon
30-Yr. Fixed Conforming. Updated hourly during market hours.
7.12%0.00
Economics

What if losing was outlawed altogether?

As we continue to see bail-out after bail-out, and government programs designed to prop up a market in dire need of correcting itself, MarketWatch’s David Weider gets to an end-game: why not just outlaw selling stocks at a loss altogether? It’s got all the features lawmakers love: it keeps up on the upward slope, and does so without using taxpayer dollars, either. His column is as funny as it is biting, recounting how the discussion in the oval office might go, sort of as a faux movie script:

Cox: But I was getting a pedicure the other day and I thought, ‘Why not just short selling?’ What about ALL selling?’ Why not make a rule that prohibits selling a stock for a price lower than the last trade. We’d stop losses altogether. Everyone would make a profit. Unlike some of these other measures you’ve heard today, it wouldn’t cost taxpayers a penny. So, what do you think of the Cox No-Loss Sale rule? Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, Lukken: Mr. President — POTUS: (holds his hands up) Hold on. Hmmm. Can we call it the Bush-Cox No-Loss Sale rule? Cox: I think so. POTUS: Do it. Effective until Jan. 19.

Funny stuff. Below is a video from Weidner that sets up the background.

Most Popular Articles

Latest Articles

Lower mortgage rates attracting more homebuyers 

An often misguided premise I see on social media is that lower mortgage rates are doing nothing for housing demand. That’s ok — very few people are looking at the data without an agenda. However, the point of this tracker is to show you evidence that lower rates have already changed housing data. So, let’s […]

3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please