So much for an April promise not to tap equity markets for more capital; Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain said then that the company “had plenty of capital going forward.” He must have meant until the end of July — on Monday evening, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) said it was heading back to the spigot for more capital, while also making the boldest attempt yet to purge itself of the toxic mortgage-related securities that have weighed so consistently on earnings for the past four quarters. Medicine for what ails? The Wall Street firm said it agreed to sell $30.6 billion gross notional amount of U.S. super senior ABS CDOs to an affiliate of Lone Star Funds for a purchase price of $6.7 billion, or 22 cents on the dollar. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, these CDOs were carried on Merrill’s books at $11.1 billion, suggesting that not only were existing write-downs not enough, but — much more ominously — that others still holding similar securities might now be forced to further mark down their own assets in a market already flooded with bad assets. “The sale of the substantial majority of our CDO positions represents a significant milestone in our risk reduction efforts,” said Thain in a press statement. The firm will take a $4.4 billion pre-tax hit in third quarter earnings tied to the sale, and will reduce its $19.9 billion super senior ABS CDO exposure at the end of Q2 to $8.8 billion, he said. But the sale wasn’t the only move made by Merrill to save its own hide — the financial giant also received $500 million to commute guarantees it bought from troubled bond insurer Security Capital Assurance (SCA), and said it would issue new common shares in a $8.5 billion public offering. Nobody said purging toxins was going to be easy, did they? Less bitter of a pill to swallow Any stock sale by Merrill was supposed to come with some bitter provisions tied to existing shareholders, designed to protect existing investors from future dilution — which will take place now, regardless. And investors largely capitulated on the issue, too, suggesting either their support for Merrill’s effort to purge or simple resignation in the face of a rising tide of losses. For one thing, Merrill said it will absorb a $2.5 billion reset payment to Temasek Holdings tied to provisions in the firm’s previous sale of securities; but Temasek, which invests on behalf of Singapore’s government, will invest all of the proceeds into Merrill’s latest stock offering. For another, investors owning $5.4 billion of the $6.6 billion of the firm’s outstanding convertible preferred shares agreed to exchange their stakes for roughly 195 million shares of common stock, plus accrued dividends. Another investor, who owns the remaining $1.2 billion, agreed to exchange their stake for new mandatory convertible preferred securities with a reference price of $33 per share. The additional dividends tied to the exchanges will cost Merrill another $2.4 billion, it said. Merrill has already raised more than $10 billion since the credit crisis began to cover credit costs tied to its ill-fated bet on residential mortgages and related derivative investments; it will nearly double that total with a stock offering that could reach as high as $9.8 billion, including the underwriters’ option. For Merrill, it’s a bold attempt to recapitalize, while simultaneously purging a good amount of the assets that have led to losses in the past few quarters. That said, the Wall Street firm held total exposure to U.S. mortgages of roughly $43.7 billion at the end of the second quarter, which stands distinct from any CDO holdings at the company. Shares in Merrill were at $24.24 in pre-market trading Tuesday morning, down .37 percent, when this story was published. Disclosure: The author held no positions in MER or other companies mentioned when this story was published; indirect holdings may exist via mutual fund investments. HW reporters and writers follow a strict disclosure policy, the first in the mortgage trade.
Merrill Makes Latest Mortgage Purging Attempt
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Lower mortgage rates attracting more homebuyers
An often misguided premise I see on social media is that lower mortgage rates are doing nothing for housing demand. That’s ok — very few people are looking at the data without an agenda. However, the point of this tracker is to show you evidence that lower rates have already changed housing data. So, let’s […]
-
Rocket Pro TPO raises conforming loan limit to $802,650 ahead of FHFA’s decision
-
Show up, don’t show off: Laura O’Connor is redefining success in real estate
-
Between the lines: Understanding the nuances of the NAR settlement
-
Down payment amounts are exploding in these metros
-
Commission lawsuit plaintiff Sitzer launches flat fee real estate startup