Nearly 90% of all originated mortgages ended up in loan portfolios backed by Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mac (FRE) or Ginnie Mae last year, leaving mortgage financing largely in the hands of the US government, according to a Deutsche Bank (DB) report on the 2010 outlook for mortgage-backed securities (MBS): Private residential mortgage-backed securitization recorded little activity in 2009, the report adds, which is a worry to both investors and policymakers within the government, as without it, “$6.7trn in today’s balances would either have to return to bank balance sheets or disappear over time,” writes MBS analyst Steven Abrahams, adding that “neither of those choices seems tenable.” Before the current crises, private securitization played a large part in mortgage origination funding (see chart below).
Currently, policymakers are considering changes to the risk retention requirements to private-label securitization, which Deutsche Bank generally supports, though as it appears in legislation, the requirements represent a “clear, if not particularly efficient effort, to clean up some conflict-of-interest issues.” As part of its efforts to help reboot securitization, the American Securitization Forum (ASF), a trade body representing private securitization market, said the 5% skin in the game requirements, while well intentioned, may have unintended consequences. “ASF’s members are committed to restoring the availability and affordability of private credit to Main Street and are particularly concerned that the 5% ‘skin-in-the-game’ provision in the proposed rules will result in accounting and regulatory capital treatments for private securitizations that could significantly reduce the availability and affordability of private lending to consumers and small businesses over time,” said Tom Deutsch, executive director of the ASF. “Such unintended consequences could create even greater reliance on a costly taxpayer-backed system of mortgage credit extension that would not be subject to these proposed rules, such as the one currently in existence through the GSEs.” Write to Jacob Gaffney. Disclosure: the author holds no relevant investments.
Jacob Gaffney is formerly Editor-in-Chief of HousingWire and HousingWire.com. He previously covered securitization for Reuters and Source Media in London before returning to the United States in 2009. While in Europe for nearly a decade, he covered bank loans and the high yield market, in addition to commercial paper, student loan, auto and credit card space(s).see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Test
The story for the housing market over the past three years has been, “Home sales are down, home prices are up.” Because inventory was so restricted after the pandemic, prices pushed higher even as demand weakened. That story may finally be inverting as unsold inventory of homes is now great enough that home prices are […]
-
Freddie Mac’s Donna Spencer on their Servicing Excellence initiative
-
Lower mortgage rates attracting more homebuyers
-
Rocket Pro TPO raises conforming loan limit to $802,650 ahead of FHFA’s decision
-
Show up, don’t show off: Laura O’Connor is redefining success in real estate
-
Between the lines: Understanding the nuances of the NAR settlement
Jacob Gaffney is formerly Editor-in-Chief of HousingWire and HousingWire.com. He previously covered securitization for Reuters and Source Media in London before returning to the United States in 2009. While in Europe for nearly a decade, he covered bank loans and the high yield market, in addition to commercial paper, student loan, auto and credit card space(s).see full bio