Housing’s 2023 forecast fest is in full swing. Already, there’s a menu of house-price landing points for the next 12 to 24 months, suited to gut instincts on a spectrum from rose-colored glasses to fairly pronounced pessimism.
Calculated Risk housing and economics analyst Bill McBride today publishes a work-in-progress chart of housing forecasts for 2023, The spectrum of best-to-worst-case scenarios spans a gamut, from a slower rate of price growth, to a relatively-mild low-single digit price drop, to a dramatic 20% to 22% look into the chasm – relatively. McBride writes: There is an especially wide range in the forecasts for house prices and shows the difficulties in modeling this housing cycle. My view is house prices will decline in 2023 and will fall 10% or more from peak-to-trough. This reflects a “dodge-the-bullet” view. Why? Well, a 10% all-in price decline would take home prices back to circa 2021 – a level most sellers, particularly among the new homebuilder set, could probably live with. Even, the hawkish 20% all-in declines projected by John Burns Real Estate Consulting and Zelman & Associates (seen here) could hardly be viewed as show stoppers. This is especially true in a new-home construction operational front where builders have begun to leverage dramatically lowered starts activity to wrest reduced input expenses among their early phase, front-end “rough” trades and suppliers. The issue always is the genuine possibility of a gap between modeled worst-case scenarios and an actual worst-case scenario that may reflect a broken model or one that fails to account for “the unthinkable.” Who knows what that might be? And you can’t plan your business on an unimagined force factor. What you can do strategically, and as a leader, is add – investment, commitment, priority focus, and time – to your margin of error. Room for error is underappreciated and misunderstood. It’s usually viewed as a conservative hedge, used by those who don’t want to take much risk. But when used appropriately it’s the opposite. Room for error lets you stick around long enough to let the odds of benefiting from a low-probability outcome fall in your favor. Since the biggest gains occur the most infrequently – either because they don’t happen often or because they take time to compound – the person with enough room for error in part of their strategy to let them endure hardship in the other part of their strategy has an edge over the person who gets wiped out, game over, insert more tokens, at the first hiccup. – Morgan Housel, Collaborative Fund Why widen the margin of error? By many lights, strong household balance sheets, sounder lending practices, more equity, strong economic fundamentals, extremely scarce for-sale inventory, and still-surging population, household, income, and family-formation demographics – not to mention a potentially momentum-changing Fed pivot on its policy rates to slower, more sensitized tightening – all point to reasonable expectations of a stabilized demand stream during the next four to six months. Here are some “what-ifs” we believe will factor into the 2023-24 runway, particularly for the homebuilding, residential development, and investment cohort of strategic decision-makers. The remote work revolution – if it’s not a couple of year blip – has to prove it has legs if it’s to continue to impact strategic land positioning and community development trends that the Covid pandemic suggested is the future. Housel, as usual, has wisdom to spare for us all when the unknown-unknowns cloud the horizon: The only truly sustainable sources of competitive advantage I know of are: