Inventory
info icon
Single family homes on the market. Updated weekly.Powered by Altos Research
702,434+11,263
30-yr Fixed Rate30-yr Fixed
info icon
30-Yr. Fixed Conforming. Updated hourly during market hours.
6.84%0.02
March 27, 2012 | Mortgage | Regulatory 2 minute read

CFPB flexes TILA muscle in 10th Circuit

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau flexed its muscle as interpreter of the Truth in Lending Act, filing a friend-of-the-court brief in the United States 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The CFPB filed the brief to back a homeowner, who claims an automatic rescission right exists when a loan fails to provide borrowers with disclosures required under Section 1635 of the TILA Act — those relating specifically to home-equity loans and second mortgages.

The CFPB’s brief is a significant step for the bureau since it shows the regulator engaging in court disputes where the bureau’s interpretation of TILA can give additional weight to consumer arguments.

The issue before the 10th Circuit is whether notification of a borrower’s rescission right within an established, three-year statutory period is enough to get the borrower out of a non-compliant loan. The second question is whether a borrower is required to follow up on its rescission notice by filing suit against the lender within the same three-year period.

Section 1635 of TILA essentially gives consumers a rescission right that can be claimed within three years of obtaining the mortgage if the borrower can show the lender violated TILA. The lender in this case claims a notice of recission is not enough, and the borrower has to follow up with an actual lawsuit.

The CFPB defended the homeowner in its brief saying: “The language of § 1635 is plain: Within three years of loan consummation, consumers must exercise their right of rescission by notifying their lender that they are doing so. If there were any ambiguity in that mandate, Regulation Z resolves it by also specifying that consumers exercise the right to rescind by providing written notice to the lender. Section 1635 and Regulation Z require no more.”

“We are committed to making sure that borrowers can exercise their rights to the full extent allowed under this law,” said CFPB director Richard Cordray. “The consumer’s right to cancel gives lenders a powerful incentive to provide the disclosures that consumers need to make good financial choices.”

kpanchuk@housingwire.com

Most Popular Articles

Latest Articles

Freddie Mac’s Donna Spencer on their Servicing Excellence initiative 

On today’s sponsored episode, Editor in Chief Sarah Wheeler talks with Donna Spencer, vice president of servicer relationship and performance management at Freddie Mac, to discuss their new Servicing Excellence initiative and the benefits for their partners. Related to this episode: Related to this episode: Servicing Excellence https://sf.freddiemac.com/articles/insights/servicing-excellence Forging a New Path: The Future of […]

Kerri Ann Panchuk was the Online Editor of HousingWire.com, and regular contributor to HousingWire magazine. Kerri joined HousingWire as a Reporter in early 2011 and since earned a law degree from Southern Methodist University. She previously worked at the Dallas Business Journal.see full bio
3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please