An often overlooked concept found in both House and Senate reform bills seeks to ensure that loan originators have an additional financial interest in the long-term success of the loan by requiring lenders to retain a portion of a loan’s risk on their books if they sell the loan to the secondary market. Though well-intentioned, this approach to risk retention has the potential to have unintended consequences stifling the recovery of both the residential and commercial real estate markets. More important, it would be duplicative of the current risk-retention requirements and require lenders to put aside large amounts of capital, limiting the credit available to consumers.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
How Paris Hilton demonstrated an age-old accounting principle and why this matters for clients
Business theory IRL
As I like to share with my MBA graduate students, the principles of our classes are not just theory. They have real-world (or, as my Gen. Z students say, IRL (in real life)) implications.
-
Making the 7-day refi reality: Why now Is the time to modernize the mortgage process
-
Affordability-first search: Why patent revival puts real estate at a crossroads
-
Here’s why non-QM earned its place at the mortgage dinner table
-
The future of QC: AI, innovation and the human element
-
The path to automation
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio